StumbleUpon vs. Digg
If you have a blog or website, chances are you have heard of Digg and StumbleUpon. And, if you are one of the many people to have a post or web page featured on one or both of these sight, you know that they can do to and for your website.
But, which one does the most for your site? Should you concentrate your efforts on promoting your website on one of these sites more than the other? I decided to do some research and it was very interesting to see the results.
Digg Spikes, StumbleUpon Boosts
One of the very first things I noticed when I started to go through the data was that each site produces very different traffic patters as can be seen by the two graphs below.
The first graph represents all of the traffic that has come to Daily Cup of Tech between September 1, 2006 and July 31, 2007 from StumbleUpon.

As you can see, there are occasional spikes in traffic as high as 2687. In contrast, the second graph represents the same data for the same time period but for referrals from Digg.

There appear to be far fewer spikes in traffic but the spikes that do come are significant with one reaching 16386 referrals (more than 6x that of StumbleUpon).
When we analyze the average number of referrals per day, it immediately looks like Digg gives use the best average daily referral rates (161.45 vs 137.53). But, if we were to remove the spikes over 1100 daily referrals (which removes seven data points from each set of information), we suddenly see that StumbleUpon provides us with a far more consistent amount of referrals (45.03 vs 104.58).
| Average | Digg | StumbleUpon |
| All Visits | 161.45 | 137.53 |
| Less Spikes Over 1100 | 45.03 | 104.58 |
Both are Addictive
If you have spent any time over at Digg or StumbleUpon, you will find that both services are highly addictive. You just want to know what is new on each of the sites. In fact, I have heard avid users of both services mention that when they are not on the respective websites, they often find themselves wondering, “What am I missing on Digg/StumbleUpon?”
One of the advantages in the addictive category that StumbleUpon has over Digg is the fact that there is an extra thrill when you click the StumbleUpon button that Digg does not provide. It’s almost like the feeling you get when you are watching the drawing for the multi-million dollar draw that you just bought a ticket for. You don’t know what is going to happen in the next few seconds but there is a chance that it could be something big!
This feeling is very addictive and I have spend many an hour saying to myself, “Just one more Stumble!”
StumbleUpon Gives A Website More of a Chance
The one down side of Digg that I have discovered is that you are limited to the description given by the Digger and the commenters. Many of these description actually turn me off the website but I always wonder whether or not I am missing something really good or interesting.
On the StumbleUpon website, you will find a very similar interaction with the user but with one big difference…the Stumble! button.
I have to admit, as a blogger and website owner, I love the Stumble! button. Instead of someone relying on the likes and opinions of others, they are simply presented with the actual website! Then, they can decide for themselves!
Digg Users are Generally More Negative than StubleUpon Users
This just may be me, but I get the general impression that Digg users are a lot more negative that StumbleUpon users. This might just be because of a lot of nasty things that were said by people who commented on the DCoT Helps Find Lost Child post and also on the Digg page which, at the time of this posting, had 1164 diggs. I’ve never seen this from StumbleUpon readers.
Digg Users Stay Longer, StumbleUpon Users Look More
When I look at the traffic that comes from each of these services, Digg users will stay on the website longer that StumbleUpon users. The average Digger will stay on the site for just over seven minutes (7:08) which is nearly 2.6 times as long as Stumblers (2:45). The website average is 7:15.
But, Stumblers tend to look around a bit when they are are the site. The average Stumbler will look at 2.29 pages per visit while Diggers check out 1.66 pages. (Website average: 2.13.) Also, Diggers have a bounce (when a reader only reads one page and then leaves) rate of 77.21% while Stumblers have a bounce rate of only 29.67%! The website’s bounce rate is 65.35%.
Both Services Bring in New Users
Both Digg and StumbleUpon are really good at bringing in users who are new to the website. Digg - 85.79%, StumbleUpon - 89.30%, Site Average - 68.69%.
Conclusions and Summary
So, which is better, Digg or StumbleUpon? To be completely honest, I welcome any traffic, regardless of its source. But, I have to admit that I think the traffic that comes from StumbleUpon appears to be of better quality and has a tendency to sustain itself over time.
| Metric | Digg |
StumbleUpon |
Website |
| Visits | 53,923 | 45,936 | 748,091 |
| Average Time on Site | 7:08 | 2:45 | 7:15 |
| Bounce Rate | 77.21% | 29.67% | 65.35% |
| Pageviews/Visit | 1.66 | 2.29 | 2.13 |
| New Visits | 85.79% | 89.30% | 68.69% |
29 Responses to “StumbleUpon vs. Digg”
-
Just Dug Up Says:
November 30th, 1999 at 12:00 amStumbleUpon vs. Digg
-
Brown Thoughts | Tech News, Gadgets, Games. All with a twist. Says:
November 30th, 1999 at 12:00 amlimited to written communication. So, the single most important thing you can do to convey an air of authority is to watch your vocabulary and your voice. Your vocabulary is the words you choose, and your voice is your style. Daily Cup Of Tech - StumbleUpon vs. Digg If you have a blog or website, chances are you have heard of Digg and StumbleUpon. And, if you are one of the many people to have a post or web page featured on one or both of these sight, you know that they can do to and for your website.
-
Hazclan13 Says:
August 6th, 2007 at 4:09 pmThe Stumble! button is quite simply why i almost never got anything done for weeks! Its addictive i ended up reading the ’super computer list’ & ‘bunnies suicides’ and allot more random stuff…
-
hawaiianpunch Says:
August 6th, 2007 at 6:28 pmMy advice is do not quit your job. Reason number one: two incomes are better than one or two birds in the hand is better than a … Reason number two: blogs are dependent on the number of viewers sharing a certain interest. This will always limit the number. Unlike selling groceries or gasoline, blogs will always have a limited viewership (sp) unless you have more variety in your blog like digg or more than one blogsphere (sp). Just my humble opinion that is not usually worth the bandwidth to express it. The best of luck whatever you decide to do.
Aloha -
downwithdigg Says:
August 6th, 2007 at 10:12 pmI’ve read and posted many comparisons between the two sites but I think the most telling statistic is monetization. Who clicks on ads? Not Digg users, that’s for damn sure. Digg users are much less inclined to utilize a site, they are there for that one post and gone, stumbleupon users, by definition are into web browsing and will spend more quality time on your site.
-
Ryan Wagner Says:
August 6th, 2007 at 10:13 pmI prefer Stumbleupon over Digg any day. Stumbleupon visitors are normally looking for interesting sites and interact more. Digg users stay on the site much less from my experience.
-
The How-To Geek Says:
August 7th, 2007 at 1:29 pmIn my experience, neither type of visitors click on ads, but that’s not really important.
Stumbleupon gets you out in front of a broader, more diverse audience, which is really the most important thing in generating traffic and growing your brand.
With digg, you just get your website in front of sniveling little ungrateful brats.
-
downwithdigg_somemore Says:
August 7th, 2007 at 2:53 pmI’ve got to disagree on the ads point, I find stumblers clicking on ads pretty frequently. Also, the only reason I want my site in front of a broad audience is so that I’ll get paid!
-
ben Says:
August 8th, 2007 at 1:59 pmVery nice, verbose article. We over at Chatsquatch love it. http://www.chatsquatch.net/2007/08/07/quickly-increase-your-traffic-with-stumbleupon/
Ben
-
Jenny Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 12:00 amI definately like Stumble better. There is just so much more to see and it’s easier to use than Digg.
-
Anonymous Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 12:07 amStumble vs. Digg…
Which do you like better? What is your preference? Read all about the pro’s and con’s of both….
-
Brown Baron Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 1:26 amTraffic from any source is welcome I agree, but I personally prefer StumbleUpon. The SU crowd actually takes the time to read your post, and look at other posts. Great analysis.
-
Chris Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 4:08 amDoes anyone know how many of the Stumble and Digg users come back.
So would it be around 7% of users who visited the site returned?
Chris @ frostfirebuzz.com
-
FeelingFlirty Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 5:09 amI find StumbleUpon addictive. Digg not at all.
-
Cynergie Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 10:24 amI am a self-confessed StumbleUpon Addict as well… Seems like the concensus is growing. I really like the “Send to” feature that enables us to rapidly send Websites and information to our friends and colleagues. I only wish it was easier to go back and review the catalog of the “I Like it!” sites.
-
KeaponLaffin Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 12:51 pmI never use Digg, and when I StumbleUpon a Digg list webpage, I usually find the selection to be rather crass and..yea stuff kids like.
I think StumbleUpon is more ’serious’ than Digg. I’ve found many sites with valuable programming tools and free/cheap software using Stumble. In addition to the fun stuff
As for clicking on Ads. I never do anyway, even the ones that get past AdBlock, sorry. But I have bookmarked and returned to many websites I’ve found with Stumble and purchased some of their CafePress merchandise,for example, so I’m not a complete jerk.
I think it’s because Stumble lets you set the topics you’re interested in, rather than looking through a list of reviews(I rarely read Stumble Reviews of a webpage) So the person StumblingUpon your website is more likely to actually be interested in your content. Hence, we’re more likely to read more articles or poke around the website a bit before we obsessively hit that Stumble! button again. -
Dave Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 6:11 pmI’ve found more interesting sites using stumble upon than any other social networking site or search engine. This has made me very addicted to stumble upon.
-
Pete White Says:
August 10th, 2007 at 3:15 amI found that the stumble upon traffic was very similar to Digg apart from the Digg traffic came all in one day whilst Stumble was over a couple of weeks.
http://imafish.co.uk/blog/post/index/155/getting-dugg-and-surviving-70000-hits-in-one-week/
-
Vitiare Says:
August 10th, 2007 at 6:41 amInterestingly enough, I just “Stumbled upon” this particular article, so I guess you would have to say that in the long run, stumbleupon is going to work better for bringing in traffic. However since I have only been running my site for less than a year, I’m not really getting much activity from either service for bringing in traffic.
If anyone has any suggestions, I’d love to hear them.
-
ken Says:
August 11th, 2007 at 2:31 amditto the above i just stumbled on to this

-
live tv Says:
August 17th, 2007 at 1:41 pmGood evaluation, Digg users are more tech-savvy and thus they may be quicker to judge or criticize.
-
datapimp Says:
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:32 amDamn this article has had more reads per day, then my site gets in two weeks. Must be something to this stumbleupon stuff. This is actually the first stumble article I ever found. I had been using Digg for a few months now here and there, but I can agree with the fact that the Digg crowd is a bit more cynical. But whatever, both companies are raking in the cash, while I just post useless comments at other peoples blogs…
-
San Diego SEO Blog Says:
September 5th, 2007 at 11:38 pmIn my study of digg vs stumbleupon the average time spent on a site was about the same. This study was taken from a 100,000 visitors from each digg and stumbleupon
-
Cayman Host Blog Says:
October 27th, 2007 at 9:50 pm8 Reasons Why I Prefer Stumbleupon Five Tips For Getting Traffic From Stumbleupon Bringing Those Stumblers Back Making a Power Account On Stumbleupon Dosh Dosh - A Comprehensive Guide To StumbleuponStumbleupon Versus DiggInternet Marketers Guide To Stumbleupon A Definitive Stumbleupon Guide Technorati Tags: Stumbleupon, Web 2.0, Social Traffic, Social Networking, Social Bookmarking, Web Traffic, Stumblers
-
Eric Says:
October 29th, 2007 at 7:57 amVery cool article! Thanks you.
-
Anonymous Says:
November 30th, 2007 at 2:51 pmwith its more community/social networking type base, and the slower burn of referrels and relationships do what digg fails to do? I hadn’t realised just how well researched and debated this subject was until I started reading articles likethisand to be honest I could probably say that I have enough evidence from what I have read, but I would really like to see what the effect is first hand. My view, for what it is worth, is that digg encourages (and rewards) one off posts - people write
-
lim chee wooi Says:
August 19th, 2008 at 9:43 amComparing to Digg, i would prefer stumbleupon. Stumbleupon made web rating and sharing so easy with just a click from toolbar.
-
Biodun Says:
August 27th, 2008 at 4:03 pmI think different social networks attract people with different dispositions. I prefer SU to digg…
-
Diggers vs Stumbleuponers Traffic Says:
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:08 pm[…] Digg Vs Stumble Traffic Experiment 3 - Digg Won […]
